|
MACEDONIAN HISTORY
Occupying the bigger part of northern Greece, Macedonia first appears on the historical
scene as a geographical-political unit in the 5th century BC, when it extended from the
upper waters of the Haliakmon and Mount Olympus to the river Strymon. In the following
century it reached the banks of the Nestos. The history of the Macedonians, however, may
be said to commence somewhere around the beginning of the 7th century BC; at this time the
Greek tribe of the Makedones, whose home was in Orestis, began to expand, driving out the
Thracians and contending with the Illyrians, and gradually occupied Eordaia, Bottiaia,
Pieria and Almopia, finally settling in the region called by Thucydides "Lower
Macedonia, or Macedonia by the Sea". Prehistoric
period
This region of high mountains, large rivers, lakes and fertile plains makes its
appearance on the stage of civilization as early as the Early Neolithic Period (Nea
Nikomedeia, region of Yanitsa). The density of the settlements, however, shows a vertical
increase at the end of the 5th millennium BC (Late Middle Neolithic) and attests,
throughout the whole of the region though especially in central and east Macedonia, to
significant mobility on the part of the population and to its characteristic dynamism.
These same settlements prospered until the Early Bronze Age - that is, until the beginning
of the 3rd millennium BC -most of them organized in the plains, with houses either square
or rectangular in plan, sometimes with wooden posts and sometimes with stone foundations
for the walls.
Stock-breeding, based on the raising of goats and sheep, was one of the prime factors
in Macedonia's development, in combination, of course, with other intra-community
activities and occupations, such as hunting and fishing. An improvement in the quality of
diet is indicated by the diversity of crops cultivated: grain, vines and olives. Exchanges
of cultural goods (jewelry, quality pottery) now multiplied, clearly an example of
prestige gifts rather than evidence of commercial contacts.
The Bronze Age finds Macedonia with fewer settlements, a circumstance that may be
interpreted either as the result of the contraction of the population or as the result of
the development of central cores at the expense of small-scale satellite settlements. The
houses are now quite frequently two-roomed, with the areas relating to the preparation of
food kept separate; they are constructed with wooden posts, and have one of the ends
apsidal in form. A still primitive system of planned streets can be detected in some of
the settlements. Both bovines and sheep and goats, along with pulses and cereals (wheat
and barley) formed part of the daily diet of the inhabitants of Macedonia, who at this
period were serving their apprenticeship in the production of bronze tools, used alongside
stone implements. The pottery, and especially the quality pottery, usually monochrome,
reveals relations with the Bronze Age pottery of central Europe, neighboring Epirus and
Thessaly, and also with that of the north-east Aegean. In time, it also acquired a certain
independence, despite the fact that in the later centuries of this same period (Bronze
Age), it was to be influenced by the outstanding achievements of the Mycenaean wheel.
Overworking of the land and the steady increase in the density of the settlements, which
now show a preference for semi-mountainous sites, suggest the evolution, with the passage
of time, of a certain hierarchy and a central authority. The articulation of society is
indicated in a general way by the differentiation in burial customs.
The transition to the following period, the Early lron Age, though not yet clearly
demarcated, is distinguished by clear destruction levels or levels indicating the
abandonment of settlements. The houses, with stone-built bases, now frequently have
wattle-and-daub walls. The dead were generally buried in organized cemeteries with earth
tumuli covering groups of cist graves, simple burials directly in the earth or in jars;
this is one of the hallmarks of the period, which is defined by the appearance of
protogeometric decorative elements on the local pottery (Vergina, West Macedonia), the
lavish use of bronze objects, mainly jewelry, the founding of settlements on spacious
sites, and the exploitation of iron deposits for the construction of weapons.
Geometric and Archaic periods
The relative isolation of the Macedonian region in the period from the 10th to the 8th
centuries BC - an isolation due to the temporary unavailability of the commercial routes
from south to north - was soon overcome, and Macedonia entered upon the Archaic period as
the promised land for the hundreds of colonists who came to the coasts of the Aegean from
many cities in southern Greece. It was during this period that colonists from southern
Greece founded Methone, Sane, Skione, Potidaia, Akanthos and many other cities-ports on
the coasts of Pieria and Chalkidike.
Bounded to the south by a long chain of mountain ranges -Ossa, Olympus and the
Kambounian Mountains, to the west by the Pindos range, to the east by the river Strymon
and then the Nestos, and to the north by Orbelos, Menoikion, Kerkine, Boras and Barnous,
Macedonia was cut off from the main body of Greece, on the ramparts of Hellenism, and
lived until the 6th century by the teachings of the Homeric epic.
The state-form was unusual: in one sense a federal state composed of autonomous
Macedonian tribes subject to the central authority (Orestai, Elimeiotai, Lynkestai), yet
also an ethnos with a strong, though democratic monarchy, and a society of farmers and
stock-breeders capable of defending their land against all foreign designs, Macedonia
evolved with the passage of the centuries into a power of world-wide (for the period)
influence and prestige.
The country was self-sufficient in products to meet basic needs (timber, cereals, game,
fish, livestock, minerals) and soon became the exclusive supplier of other Greek states
less blessed by nature, though at the same time it came to be the target of expansionist
schemes dictated largely by economic interests. A particularly "introspective"
land, with conservative customs and way of life and a social structure and political
organization of a markedly archaic character, speaking a distinctive form of the Doric
dialect, Macedonia took over the reigns of the Greek spirit in the 4th century BC, when
the city-state was entering on its decline; revealing admirable adaptability in the face
of the demands of the present and the achievements of the past, and ingenuity and boldness
when confronted with the problems of the future, the country was quickly transformed into
a performer of new roles, open ing up new roads towards the epoch of the Hellenism of
three continents.
Language
The Macedonians were a Dorian tribe, according to the testimony of Herodotus (1, 56):
"(The Dorian ethnos) ... dwelt in Pindos, where it was called Makednon; from there
... it came to the Peloponnesus, where it took the name of Dorian". And elsewhere
(VIII, 43): "these (that is, the Lacedaimonians, Corinthians, Sikyonians etc.),
except the people of Hermione, were of the Dorian and Makednon ethnos, and had most
recently come from Erineos and Pindos and Dryopis". A Dorian tribe, then, that
expanded steadily to the east of Pindos and far beyond, conquering areas in which dwelt
other tribes, both Greek and non-Greek.
For many centuries, Macedonia remained on the fringe of the Greek world. In the
mountainous regions of Macedonia, at least, the way of life will have consisted
predominantly of transhumant pasturage. Education will, at best, have been confined to
aristocratic circles and those connected with them. We do not, therefore, expect to find
any written texts of a private nature from the Archaic period. In the rest of the Greek
world, writing is related to the structure and mechanisms of the city-state, and is used
mainly for the recording of justice in the broadest sense of the word. Under a monarchical
regime like that of Macedonia, however, and in a world of nomads, we would hardly expect
to find public documents.
At about the end of the 6th century BC, the changed socio-economic circumstances
deriving from permanent settlement and the intensification of economic and cultural
relations with the rest of the Greek world led to the creation of the preconditions for
the use of writing, mainly for the purposes of diplomatic relations. The local dialect a
member, as far as we can judge, of the group known as the north-west Greek dialects, which
included Phokian, the Lokrian dialects, etc., had no written tradition, whether literary
or other. Consequently, the rise of education and culture was to the detriment of the
Macedonian speech. Attic was selected as the language of education, and the local dialect
was "smothered" by the written language, the koine, and was never, or hardly
ever, written down, being restricted to oral communication between Macedonians. From as
early as the time of Alexander the Great, moreover, Macedonian lost ground to the koine in
this sphere too, if we are to believe the historical sources, and there is certainly no
evidence that it was spoken in the centuries after Christ. Only its memory was perpetuated
through the use of personal names until the 4th century AD
Although very little of the Macedonian tongue has survived, there is no doubt that it
was a Greek dialect. This is clear from a whole series of indications and linguistic
phenomena by which the koine of the region is "colored" which are not Attic but
which can only have derived from a Greek dialect. For example: The vast majority of even
the earliest names, whether dynastic names or not, are Greek, formed from Greek roots and
according to Greek models: Hadista, Philista, Sostrata, Philotas, Perdikkas, Machatas and
hundreds of others. In general, the remnants of the Macedonian dialect that have come down
to us have a completely different character from Ionic. This circumstance is patent proof
that there can be no question of the ancient Macedonians having been Hellenised, as has
been asserted (Karst), for such Hellenisation could have been only by the Greek colonies
on the Macedonian coast, in which the Ionian element was predominant (Beloch).
The fact that Roman and Byzantine lexicographers and grammarians cited examples from
Macedonian in order to interpret particular features of the Homeric epics must mean that
Macedonian - or rather, what survived of Macedonian at the period in question - was a very
archaic dialect, and preserved features that had disappeared from the other Greek
dialects; it would be absurd to suggest that these scholars, in their commentaries on the
Homeric poems, might have compared them with a non-Greek language. The name given to the
Macedonian cavalry - hetairoi tou basileos - "the King's Companions" - is also
indicative: this occurs only in Homer, and was preserved in the historical period only
amongst the Macedonians.
The anonymous compiler of the Etymologicum Magnum notes in the entry on Aphrodite,
probably adopting a comment by the earlier grammarian Didymos: "V is akin to F. This
is clear from the fact that the Macedonians call Philip "Vilip" and pronounce
falakros [bald] "valakros" the Phrygians "Vrygians" and the winds
(fysitas) "vyktas". Homer refers to "vyktas anemous" (blowing winds).
Observations of this type abound. Male and female names occur in Macedonian ending in -as
and -a, where in Attic we have -es and -e: Alketas, Amyntas, Hippotas, Glauka, Eurydika,
Andromacha, and dozens more. A feature bequeathed by Macedonian to the koine and also to
Modern Greek is the genitive of so-called first declension masculine nouns in -a: Kallia,
Teleutia, Pausanea (the Attic ending was -ou). The long alpha is retained in the middle of
words (as in all dialects other than Ionic-Attic dialects): Damostratos, Damon etc. and
Iaos" rather than the "Ieos" of Ionic Attic, is used to form compounds,
occurring as both the first and the second element. The koine of Macedonia, for all its
conservatism and dialect coloring, follows a parallel path to the koine of other regions,
though not always at the same moment in time. Whatever the case, all the changes that
marked the Greek language in general and the north Greek dialects in particular, can be
followed in the inscriptions of Macedonia.
Classical period
Although Herodotus and Thucydides, both of whom were aware of the genealogy of the
Macedonian Argead or Temenids dynasty, made Perdikkas I the head of the family, and
moreover at tributed to him the foundation of the state (first half of the 7th century
BC), tradition records the names of kings earlier than Perdikkas (Karanos, Koinos,
Tyrimmas). It was, however, only after protracted clashes with the Illyrians and the
Thracians, and temporary subjection to Persian suzerainty (510-479 BC)- a period during
which the Macedonians established themselves in "Lower Macedonia" - that the
country acquired its definitive form and character. Through the organizational and
administrative abilities of its first great leader, Alexander I, called the Philhellene,
whose timely information to the southern Greeks contributed to the defeat of the Persian
forces of Xerxes and Mardonios, the suzerainty of the Macedonian kingdom was extended both
to the west of the lower Strymon valley and to the region of Anthemous. This brought
economic benefits, including the exploitation of a number of silver mines in the area of
lake Prasias (the first Macedonian coins were struck at this time), and the independent
Macedonian principalities of west and north Macedonia were united around the central
authority, recognizing the primacy of the Temenids king. The entry of the state into the
history of southern Greece was sealed by the acceptance of Alexander I by the hellanodikai
as a competitor in the Olympic games (probably those of 496 BC), in which, as we know,
only Greeks were allowed to participate.
Perdikkas II, the first-born son of Alexander I, who ruled for forty years (454-412/13
BC), not only had to face dynastic strife, but also had to be continuously on the alert to
deal with the problems created for him by the Thracian tribes and the Lynkestai and
Elimeiotai on one hand, and on the other by the doubtful outcome of the Peloponnesian War,
which threw the Greek world into turmoil in the 5th century BC, bringing Athenian and
Spartan armies, at various times, into the heart of Macedonia. Acting always according to
the dictates of political advantage, Perdikkas II proved himself a skillful diplomat and a
wily leader, astute in his decisions and flexible in his alliances, and set as the aim of
his diplomacy the preservation of the territorial integrity of his kingdom. The completion
of the internal tasks that Perdikkas II was prevented from accomplishing by the external
situation fell to his successor, Archelaos I; he is credited by the ancient sources and
modern scholarship alike with great sagacity and with sweeping changes in state
administration, the army and commerce. During his reign, the defense of the country was
organized, cultural and artistic contacts with southern Greece were extended, and the
foundations were laid of a road network. A man of culture himself, the king entertained in
his new palace at Pella, to where he had transferred the capital from Aigai, poets and
tragedians, and even the great Euripides, who wrote his tragedies Archelaos and The
Bacchae there; he invited brilliant painters - the name of Zeuxis is mentioned - and at
Dion in Pieria, the Olympia of Macedonia, he founded the "Olympia", a religious
festival with musical and athletic competitions in honor of Olympian Zeus and the Muses.
By 399 BC, the year in which he was murdered, Archelaos I had succeeded in converting
Macedonia into one of the strongest Greek powers of his period. In the forty years
following the death of Archelaos I , Macedonia formed a field for all kinds of conflict
and realignments, and was the object of competition between kings who reigned for very
brief periods; the country was ravaged by the savage incursions of the Illyrians, captured
by the Chalkidians, and obliged to yield to the demands of the Athenians; despite all
this, however, it recovered to some degree with Amyntas III on the throne and, with the
accession of Philip II (359 BC), succeeded in regaining its self-belief and recovering its
former strength. This charismatic ruler, whose strategic genius and diplomatic ability
transformed Macedonia from an insignificant and marginal country into the most important
power in the Aegean and paved the way for the pan-Hellenic expedition of his son to the
Orient, was an expansive leader who had the breadth of vision to usher the ancient world
into the epoch of the Hellenism of three continents. During the course of his tempestuous
life, he firmly established the power of the central authority in the kingdom, reorganized
the army into a flexible and amazingly efficient unit, strengthened the weaker regions of
his realm through movements of population, and, abroad, made Macedonia incontestably
superior to the institution of the city-state which, at this precise period, was facing
decline. His unexpected death at the hands of an assassin in 336 BC, in the theater at
Aigai on the very day of the marriage of his daughter Cleopatra to Alexander, the young
king of the Molossians, brought to an end a brilliant career, the final aim of which was
to unify the Greeks in order to exact vengeance on Persia for the invasion of 481-480 BC;
Macedonia, in complete control of affairs in the Balkan peninsula, was ready to assume its
new role. A fascinating sequence of political events with a highly favorable outcome and
military victories with world-wide repercussions, the resolution of a number of
intractable problems of an inter-state nature, and a series of inspired programs and
visions implemented with great success in a short space of time - these are the component
elements in the panorama of the life of the great general and civilizer Alexander III, who
was justly called the Great and who has passed into the pantheon of legend. And if his
victories at Granikos (334 BC), Issos (333 BC), Gaugamela (331 BC) and Alexandria Nikaia
(326 BC) may be thought of as sons worthy of their father, bringing about the overthrow of
the mighty Persian empire and distant India, the prosperous cities founded in his name as
far as the ends of the known world were his daughters - centers of the preservation and
dissemination of Greek spirit and culture. From this world of daring and passion, of
questing and contradiction the robust Hellenism of Macedonia carried the art of man to the
ends of the inhabited world, bestowing poetry upon the mute and, in the infancy of
mankind, instilling philosophical thought. In the libraries that were now founded from the
Nile to the Indus, in the theaters that spread their wings under the skies of Baktria and
Sogdiana, in the Gymnasia and the Agoras Homer suckled as yet unborn civilizations,
Thucydides taught the rules of the science of history, and the great tragedians and Plato
transmitted the principle of restraint and morality to absolutist regimes. Alexander's
contribution to the history of the world is without doubt of the greatest importance: his
period, severing the "Gordian Knot" with the Greek past, opened new horizons
whose example would inspire, throughout the centuries that followed, all those leaders
down to Napoleon himself who left their own mark on the course of mankind in both the East
and the West.
Despite
the unfavorable outcome of affairs on the external front, however, and despite the
restraining intervention of the Romans at the expense of the territorial integrity of the
country, which was deprived of its possessions in southern Greece and Asia Minor (197
BC), Philip's V prestige and influence was revealed long ago by dedications at the most
famous Greek sanctuaries (Delos, Rhodes, Karia). His dynamism with regard to the vision
of a great and powerful Macedonia is attested by his internal policy during the final
decade of his rule (188-179 BC): during these years, the planned exploitation of the
mines, the granting to the cities in the kingdom of the right to mint coins, the
imposition of harbor dues, the increasing of taxation and the provision of grants to
encourage child-bearing, all led not only to recovery but also to the accumulation of
wealth.
This prosperity and a sound incomes policy, together with the rise of trade and the
liberalization of local institutions in the major urban centers, filled the royal treasury
with liquid funds and the granaries with stores of grain, and armed 18,000 mercenaries
under the rule of his successor, Perseus, the last king of Macedonia. The 6,000 talents
and the vast quantities of precious vessels that came into the hands of Aemilius Paulus on
the morrow of the decisive battle of Pydna (168 BC) attest to the economic vigour of the
state up to the very eve of its collapse.
Roman period
This, then, was the end of the kingdom beneath Mount Olympus, which had been the common point of reference for all the Hellenistic kingdoms of the East and had supplied
succeeding generations with Greek ideals. It was essentially a nation state, in contrast
with the "spear-won" kingdoms of the epigoni (Successors) in which the
Macedonians were always a minority of foreign conquerors, a conservative country, certainly, devoted to its traditional institutions, so different from the immense new
empires of the Seleucids and the Ptolemies, with their heterogeneous populations. Far
removed from the deification of leaders, from vainglorious titles, from the appellations
and dooms of excess, Macedonia confronted its destiny as once its Stoic king Antigonos II
Gonatas had confronted the highest office, which had been bestowed upon him: as glorious
slavery!
A menace to the Roman Senate, the land of Alexander was divided into four merides (portions), or economic and administrative districts, and the possession or sale of landed
property between them was forbidden, as was intermarriage. The Macedonians were described
as "free" (in reality, under the tutelage of the Romans), paid a tax and were
obliged to maintain an army only large enough to protect their own borders against the
barbarian tribes of the north. This regime, however, lasted no more than twenty years:
anti-Roman sentiments on the one hand, and social friction between the privileged classes
and the masses on the other, and above all the deterioration of the internal situation led
to the re volt of Andriskos, an adventurer who claimed to be the son of Perseus. With the
crushing of his rebellion by the Roman legions (148 BC) Macedonia now belonged to the
past, even as a protectorate: the senate decided to turn it into a province (provincia
Macedonia)- the first Roman province in the East - and incorporate it into the Roman
empire, installing a governor with his headquarters at Thessaloniki and an army. The
period from 148 BC to the advent of Augustus (27 BC) was undoubtedly one of the most burdensome for the country which, administratively, now stretched from the Ionian sea to the
Nestos river, and from mount Olympus to the source of the Axios river: the continuous
incursions of barbarian tribes (Skordiskoi, Bessoi, Thracians) throughout the second
century BC, the invasion by the armies of Mithridates VI, supported by the Maidoi, the
Dardanians and the Sintoi, at the be ginning of the first, and the upheaval, decimation
and ravaging inflicted on it during both the first Civil War (Pompey-Caesar, 49-48 BC) and
the second (Brutus/Antony-Octavian, 42 BC), turned the province into a huge battlefield,
with severely adverse consequences for the land and its inhabitants.
The construction of the Via Egnatia from Dyr rachion to Byzantion (in a second stage)
as a continuation of the Via Appia on the Italian main land, and the settling of colonists
(Dion, Cassan dreia, Pella, Philippoi) and Italian merchants may have transformed the
economic and demographic face of the country, but it did not bring about the latinization
of the inhabitants, who retained their Greek personality and speech to the end.
In a pacified empire, living under the protec tion of the Pax Romana in the rearguard
of mili tary enterprises, and a senatorial province from 27 BC to AD 15 and from AD 44
onwards, Macedonia moved onto a different plane. In the "free" cities of
Thessaloniki, Amphipolis and Skotoussa, as in the tribute paying (tributariae) cities,
the communities in time adjusted to the new state of affairs ordained by Augustus, while
preserving their ancient institutions of government (assem bly, council and magistrates);
new town-plans were laid out, grand building complexes (agoras, temples) now proclaimed
the glory of new gods and earthly lords, honorific altars were erected for select members
and officials in a display of gratitude, and fine marble funerary buildings were designed
to perpetuate the memory of sim ple mortals and distinguished citizens after their death.
And it is the countless inscriptions - often verbose in their attempt to flatter - that
preserve names, professions, lists of ephebes, artists' guilds, dedicators, religious
associations, immor talizing the passing moment and completing the mosaic of our knowledge
of a region of the Ro man world that appears to follow the fortune of a disarmed province.
It is the inscriptions that in form us about the existence of koina - those organizations
that stood between the Roman ad ministration and the local authorities; about the holding
of games called Pythia, Actia, Alexan dreia Olympia; about the occasional transit of
emperors and their armies, and the anchoring of fleets. And of course, about the
preservation in the memory of the Macedonians of the man who glorified their name to the
ends of the inhabited world.
Forgotten in its wilderness, the province of Macedonia strengthened the fortifications
of its cities - often, indeed, demolishing the adjacent buildings - when, in the middle of
the 3rd century, the Carpi, the Goths and the Heruls reached the Aegean, laying everything
waste.
In the twilight of the Roman gods, and of all the other deities of oriental or Egyptian
origins for whom the country had provided fertile ground on which to establish and
disseminate themselves, Christianity offered to Thessaloniki, Philippoi, and Beroia,
resignation, redemption and life beyond death, from as early as 50 BC, when saint Paul the
Apostle of the Nations preached the new religion. It prepared the ground for the
resurrection of the dead and also for the regeneration of the empire. An empire tossing
and turning amidst the instability of opportunistic government by a host of ambitious
contenders for power, an empire in the chaos of economic decline, threatened with the
breaching of the integrity of its borders by the repeated incursions of barbarian tribes,
and humbled by heavy defeats on the field of battle.
The assumption of power by Diocletian in AD 280 - an event that formed a landmark in
the his tory of the Roman empire and laid the founda tions for a new era - was of the
greatest impor tance for Macedonia, as for the rest of the em pire, leading as it did to a
way out of the crisis.
Diocletian's administrative changes returned Macedonia to her natural boundaries. Part
of the diocese of the Moesia was assigned to the praes es (ruler), who was responsible to
the vicarius (vicar), the supreme governor. The situation was standardized first as a
result of the changes made by Constantine the Great, according to which Macedonia, along
with Thessaly, Epirus Vetus and Epirus Nova, Achaia and Crete formed the diocese of
Macedonia, and then in the second half of the 4th century AD when the dio cese of
Macedonia, Dacia and Pannonia com bined to form the praefecture of Illyricum, with its
capital at Thessaloniki; there were further changes, however, at the beginning of the 5th
century, with Macedonia divided into "Macedonia Prima" and "Macedonia
Salutaris".
Byzantine period
Macedonia's strategic importance at the crossroads of the major arterial roads in the
Bal kan peninsula meant that during the critical peri od marking the transition from the
late Roman to the Byzantine period it was the object of bene factions from the royal
house, despite the gener al upheavals of the times. Manifestations of this interest
included the transfer of the capital to Thessaloniki by Galerius Maximian, and the
erection there of an imposing palace; the construction in the same city of a capacious
dock yard by Constantine the Great (AD 322/323), and the choice of the capital of
Macedonia as the headquarters of Theodosius the Great (AD 379/380) for his campaigns
against the Visigoths and Ostrogoths. The economic prosperity of Macedonia in the 4th and
5th centuries AD is at tested by the large numbers of quarries (Thasos, Prilep), furnaces
for the smelting of metals, work shops for the construction of weapons and metal objects,
pottery workshops and centers product ing beads of glass-paste; there is also evidence for
the existence of extensive farms, salt-flats, yarn dyers (Stoboi), the organizing of trade
fairs ("Demetria") and the carrying on of a trade in leather. This prosperity
was undoubtedly respon sible for the imposing buildings (whether of a re ligious or
secular character) brought to light in many places by the archaeologist's spade: basili
cas, villas and fortifications.
It was upon this world, a world deeply influ enced by Christianity, a world that slowly
and surely cast off its Roman toga to don the Byzan tine purple, a world sorely tried by
the incursions of the Goths, the Avars, and all the others who had designs on its wealth
and power, that faith in mission of the "God of mercy" erected the thousand-year
empire of the East, to guide and enlighten the West. It raised the cross of the Res
urrection as far afield as the banks of the Da nube, in castles, in churches adorned with
mosaics, and in bath-houses. Proclaiming the glory of men like Justinian I, the courage of
a Heraklios, the majesty of Constantine VII Porphyrogennitus. In the face of the Avars and
the Slavs, the Bul gars and the Arabs.
As the countryside was depopulated by the repeated barbarian incursions and the
majority of the inhabitants sought refuge and protection in the urban centers, the cities
were transformed into centers of intense commercial and cultural activity. Ports like
those of Thessaloniki and Christoupolis (Kavala), with their granaries and heavy traffic
in sea-faring ships, and also pros perous cities in the hinterland, such as Herakleia
Lynkestis, Bargala, Serrhai and Philippoi, were adorned with brilliant buildings; their
fortifications were strengthened, and their old urban tissue was abandoned as new programs
of urban development were implemented (to which the destructive earthquakes of the 7th
century made their contribution).
It was at this period, moreover, that the administrative system of
"themes"(districts), al ready tested in areas of Asia Minor exposed to great
danger, was introduced to the European regions of the empire. The characteristic features
of this system were the concentrating in one and the same person of military and political
au thority, and a change in the composition of the ar my. Macedonia was divided between
two "themes" - the "theme of Thessaloniki" (from the Pindos range to
the Strymon river) and the "theme of Strymon" (the modern counties of Ser rhai,
Xanthe and Rhodope), the latter with its capital at Serrhai.
The integration of the Slavs into Byzantine so ciety (9th century AD), the result
partly of their conversion to Christianity by Cyril and Methodios and partly of the
extension of Byzantine influence to the interior of the Balkans, had direct conse quences
for Macedonia, whose cities benefited from the peace that now prevailed. Thessaloniki
evolved into an important cosmopolitan center to which flowed merchandise from East and
West. Churches were erected at Kastoria and Beroia and adorned with wall-paintings in
which were crystallized the basic elements of large-scale art after the triumph of
Orthodoxy and the triumph of the icons.
Before 1204, the year in which Constantino ple was captured by the crusaders of the
Fourth Crusade, Macedonia was shaken by the uphea vals and the ravaging and taking of
prisoners at tending successive invasions by the Bulgarians, first under Symeon (AD
894-927) and then under Samuel (AD 989-1018), and suffered the humiliation of seeing its
capital fall into the hands of Arab pirates (AD 904); almost three hundred years later,
the same city, along with others (Kastoria and Serrhai) was captured after a siege by the
Normans of Sicily (AD 1185). This is the reason that the 9th and 10th centuries in
Macedonia have no great achievements to show in the sphere of cultural activity. A
contributing factor in this was, of course, the strict centraliza tion that informed the
policy of the Macedonian dynasty. By contrast, the 1 1th and 12th centuries bestowed upon
the north Greek administrative division men of the church and of letters, of the stature
of Theophylact Hephaistos (the famous archbishop of Bulgaria, with his see at Ochrid),
Michael Choumnos (metropolitan of Thessaloniki), and Eustathios Kataphloros (Metropolitan
of Thessaloniki and a famous scholiast on classical texts). They contributed to a
flowering of ecclesiastical architecture and church painting (Beroia, Edessa, Melenikon,
Serrhai, Ayios Achillios, Thessaloniki, Mount Athos, Nerezi, Kastoria and Ochrid) of such
intensity that these churches formed models for creations in other Balkan lands and as far
afield as Russia and Georgia in the East and Sicily and north ern Italy in the West.
Wall-paintings of the quality of Saint Panteleimon at Nerezi (1162) - a typical example of
Komne nan painting, with its pronounced depiction of passion and its soft lines in the
rendering of bod ies, tall and elegant in their other-worldly Man nerism - or of the
Latomos monastery in Thessa loniki (2nd half of the 12th century), and of the Anargyroi at
Kastoria and Saint Nikolaos Kasnit zes in the same city (12th century), with their re
fined academic style; these are all undoubtedly points of reference for the artistic
production and achievement of this age, before the empire was dismembered by the Latins
and divided into king doms, baronies, and counties. And, of course, we should not forget
the superb compositions of the portable icons and mural mosaics.
Frankish period
With the collapse of the Byzantine Empire and its dismemberment by the western crusad
ers (Partitio Romaniae), the whole of Macedonia became subject to the Frankish kingdom of
Thes saloniki, of which Boniface, marquis of Montfer rat was appointed ruler. Despite the
fact that they had prevailed, however, the new lords had to cope both with rivalries
amongst themselves, and with the expansionist visions of Kalojan, the Bulgarian tzar
Ioannitzes, who in 1207, the year of his death, arrived with his armies before the walls
of Thessaloniki, having first captured Ser rhai and taken prisoner Baldwin, emperor of Con
stantinople.
The situation became increasingly confused as time went on: the Bulgarian state was con
sumed by inter-dynastic quarrels and after the death of Boniface, the Frankish kingdom of
Thes saloniki fell into the hands of guardians of mi nors: the new despot of the so-called
"Despotate" of Epirus, the ambitious Theodore Komnenos Doukas An gelos (121
5-1230), brother of the founder of the state, Michael II Komnenos Dou kas Angelos,
systematically extended his pos sessions from Skodra in Illyria to Naupaktos (Le panto)
and, by steadily advancing his armies, succeeded in capturing the bride of the Therma ic
gulf and dissolving the second largest Latin bastion in the Balkans (1224). He was
defeated, however, by the Bulgarian tzar lvan Asen II in 1230, at the battle of
Klokotnitsa, as a result of which his kingdom contracted to the area around Thessaloniki
and shortly afterwards became subject to the rising power of the period, the em pire of
Nicaea. In December 1246, loannis III Va tatzes, after a victorious advance, during which
he captured Serrhai, Melenikon, Skopje, Velessa and Prilep, entered the city of saint
Demetrios in triumph, and installed as its governor the Great Domestic Andronikos
Palaiologos.
Caught at the center of expansionist designs, struggles for survival and domination and
at tempts to recover lost prestige, Macedonia re pulsed the attacks of the
"Despotate" of Epirus, warded off the united armies of king Manfred of Sicily
and Villehardouin, ruler of Achaia, and re captured Kastoria, Edessa, Ochrid, Skopje and
Prilep, before eventually being incorporated into the Byzantine Empire, which was
reconstituted on the morrow of 1261 with the capture of the Queen of Cities by Michael
VIII Palaiologos.
These were ephemeral, "Pyrrhic victories", for the final page of the
Byzantine epic augured the demise of a legend that had been kept alive for over a thousand
years. The wretched condi tion of the empire in every sphere enabled the Serbs of Stephen
Dusan to make deep advances to the south (1282ff.), and the mercenaries of the Catalan
Company to devastate the Chalkidi ke and Mount Athos (1308ff.), fuelled fratricidal
dynastic strife between the Palaiologoi and the Kantakouzenoi, and gave rise to social
turbu lence such as that provoked by the Zealots in Thessaloniki.
And as the fortresses of moral and material resistance, buffeted by the maelstrom of
the times, fell one after the other on the altar of short- term political planning and
superstitious delusion, the myopic response to the reality of the situation brought the
pagan hordes to European soil and shackled the right hand of Western civilization and
Christianity. The last defenders of cities and ideals - an outstanding example of whom was
the restless Manuel, governor of Thessaloniki from 1369 and subsequently emperor in
Constantino ple as Manuel II - felt the death rattle of Serrhai (1383) as the 14th century
expired, and heard the protracted screams of Drama, Zichna, Be roia, Servia and
Thessaloniki itself - once in 1395 and once, for the last time, in 1430 - with the
crescent moon flying on its battlements.
Amidst the ruins of the nation, the only bea cons of endurance for the enslaved
population, the only points of reference to the glorious past for those who abandoned the
sinking ship in good time, making their way to the West, were the books in which they took
refuge in the harsh cen turies that followed - the deeply philosophical treatises, the
pained verses, the inspired compo sitions of men like Thomas Magistros, Demetrios
Triklinios, Theodore Kabasilas, Gregorios Pala mas, Demetrios Kydones, and the wise jurist
Constantine Armenopoulos. The strikingly warm monuments of the Christian faith, created by
named and anonymous mosaicists, painters of cosmic universe, architects of the undomed di
vine: in the Peribleptos at Ochrid (1295), in Saint Nikolaos Orphanos, in the Holy
Apostles (1312- 1315), in Saint Elias (at Thessaloniki), in Saint Nikolaos Kyritzes (at
Kastoria), in the Church of Christ at Beroia (1315), in the Basilica of the Pro taton at
Karyes on Mount Athos (end of the 13th century). In the field of myth, masters of the pal
ette such as the painter Manuel Panselinos and his fellow artists Eutychios and Michael
Astrapas and Georgios Kalliergis.
And it was precisely at this period, when the rumored impending judgment of the souls
in heaven was menacing terrified mortals on earth with its sword, that there occurred a
change in the consciousness of the Byzantine world which led oppressed Hellenism to an
unprecedented self awareness, taking it back to the roots of its origins.
Faced with Ottoman predomination, the impo sition of the Muslim religion by forced
conver sions to Islam where necessary, the arrival in Macedonia a few years after the fall
of Constan tinople of thousands of Jewish refugees from Spain, and the migrations of
Vlach- and Slav- speaking groups, the Greek element in the Em pire - the
"Romaioi"(Romans) as they were called by the Turks - acquired an inner strength
and ral lied round the Great Idea of casting off the for eign yoke and its alien language
and religion. Through the encouragement of the crusading Or thodox Church, the
preservation of Greek- speaking schools, and revolutionary remittances from the Greeks of
the diaspora, especially those in Italy, it kept alive its knowledge, its language and its
dreams. And as time went on and the deep wounds of the first decades of slavery were
forgotten, it achieved great things in commerce and trade, on the diplomatic front, in
administra tion, and in public relations.
Macedonia under Turkish Rule (the Tourkokratia)
While ruined cities like Thessaloniki, victims of the conquest, were repopulated with
peoples from every region of the Ottoman Empire, others, such as Yanitsa (Yenice), were
new creations with a purely Turkish population. About the mid dle of the 15th century,
Monastir had 185 Chris- tian families, Velessa 222 and Kastoria 938. Thessaloniki, a
century later, counted 1087 fam ilies and Serrhai 357. In Drama, Naousa and Ka vala, the
main language spoken was Greek. The same was true of Servia, Kastoria, Naousa and
Galatista. Stromnitsa, like Yanitsa, was a Turkish city. Jewish communities of some
importance were to be found in Beroia, where there were equal numbers of Moslems and
Christians, and in Serrhai, Monastir, Kavala and Drama. Few Slav speakers remained in the
countryside of Eastern Macedonia - the remnants of Stephen Dusan's empire - though there
were more in Western and the north of Central Macedonia.
The inhabitants, new and old, lived in separ ate communities, and were jointly
responsible for the implementation of orders from the central au thority, for the
preservation of order and, most importantly of all, for the payment of taxes. The
administration of the community was in the hands of the local aristocracy, which was
permitted cer tain initiatives of a philanthropic or cultural na ture. This local autonomy
in matters of adminis tration also extended to the hearing by archbish ops of cases
involving family and inheritance law, in accordance with Byzantine custom-law.
The administrative system of the Ottoman Empire was based on its military organization
and, at the beginning of the period, the European conquests formed a single military and
political district (the Eyalet of Roumelia), governed by the beyrlebey, a high-ranking
official. In time, this broad unit was divided and Macedonia was brok en up into smaller
sections, of which Western Macedonia was assigned initially to the sanjak of Skopje and
later to those of Ochrid and Monastir. By contrast, both Central and Eastern Macedo nia
formed separate sanjaks, with their capitals at Thessaloniki and Kavala respectively. The
northern areas were assigned to the sanjak of Kyustendil.
As during the Byzantine period, cereals, ap ples, olives, flax and vegetables were
cultivated on the fertile plains of Macedonia. As the centu ries passed, tobacco, cotton
and rice were ad ded to them. The creation of settlements in the mountainous areas and the
intensification of stock-raising led to a reduction in the forested ar ea. Trout from the
rivers and lakes supplied the markets of Constantinople. From the numerous metal, silk and
textile workshops - which owed much to the skills of the Jewish element - the em pire
ordered objects for daily use and also luxury goods. Goldsmiths, builders, chandlers,
furriers, armourers, dyers of thread and cloth-makers in a few years turned the villages
and towns in which they settled into bustling production and distribution centers. They
were a source of pros perity, economic strength, building activity, and intense
competition. The caravans that trans ported the labour and skills of these craftsmen to
Vienna, Sofia and Constantinople competed with the boats from the ports of Thessaloniki
and Ka vala, which discharged their cargoes at both ends of the Mediterranean. And since
Hermes Kerdoos (the god of commerce) invariably walked hand in hand in Greece with Hermes
Lo gios (the god of letters), as soon as the tempest of the conquest had subsided and the
Greeks had gained control of trade and production, the Greek expatriates achieved great
things in the free lands of Austro-Hungary, Germany, France and Italy (both before and
after the fall of Con stantinople); the church assumed a leading role, supplanting the
imperial authority; thirst for knowledge and the imparting of knowledge led initially to
the foundation of church schools and then to the building of community educational in
stitutions, to which flocked not only the Greeks but also the Greek-speakers of the
Balkans.
Through benefactions from wealthy Macedo nians such as Manolakis (1682) and Demetrios
Kyritzis (1697) from Kastoria, young men were educated in Beroia, Serrhai, Naousa, Ochrid
Kleisoura and Kozani. Thanks to the inspired teaching of men like Georgios Kontaris, schol
arch (head of school) at Kozani (1668-1673) Georgios Parakeimenos, headmaster in the same
city (1694-1707), Kallinikos Varkosis. scholarch at Siatista (until 1768), and Kallinikos
Manios in Beroia (about 1650), the Macedonians were able to partake of ancient and
ecclesiasti cal literature and were initiated into the new achievements of science, which
the intellectual pioneers of the Greek spirit were transporting from the educated West.
There were many too however, who, either as refugees to the West or as willing emigrants,
transmitted their own pre cious lights to the regenerated world of Europe: men like
loannis Kottounios (1572-1657), lecturer in the Universities of Padua, Bologna and Pisa.
Demetrios, the Patriarch's envoy to Wurtemberg (1559), and Metrophanis Kritopoulos,
teacher of Greek in Venice (1627-1630).
Up until the beginning of the 19th century, though with a substantial break during the
period of the Russian-Turkish confrontations (1736-38 and 1768-77), the Macedonian
countryside pros pered greatly and was at the same time the scene of unprecedented
building activity. New villages were constructed and existing townships extended and
beautified; amidst a climate of prosperity and expanding trade, two-storey ar chontika
(mansions) were erected at Siatista, Kozani, Kastoria, Beroia and Florina; their tiled
roofs, carved wooden ceilings, and elegant built in wooden cupboards, their reception
rooms lav ishly painted with floral, narrative and other mo tifs, and their spacious
cellars and shady court yards, all reflected the wealth of their owners and the
achievements of a popular art that skill fully combined the lessons of tradition with a
wide variety of borrowings from East and West.
For some time after the collapse of the Byz antine Empire, the subject Christians of
Macedo nia were content to fulfill their Christian duties by using the churches that had
escaped pillaging by the conquerors. As the flock steadily increased, however, and the old
buildings began to feel the adverse effects of time, while the inhabitants grew more
prosperous, the need to repair and beautify the houses of God under the jurisdiction of
the Greek communities and also to erect new ones became inescapable. Painters from Kasto
ria, and then from Crete, Epirus, and Thebes, in guilds or individually, criss-crossed
Macedonia from as early as the 15th century, and hymned the glories of the Orthodox faith
with their pal ettes, some in a primitive style, others with a more academic, refined
intent. Yet others from Hionades, Samarina, and Selitsa near Eratyra immortalized human
vanity in secular buildings and, in the encyclopedic spirit of the age, por trayed
philosophers, fantastic landscapes, the dream of the soul - Constantinople - and the
vision of progress - cities of Western Europe.
Modern times
And as the wheel of destiny, after many cen turies, furrowed the roads of the final
decision, and an unquenchable desire for freedom con sumed petty interests and leveled out
vainglori ous vacillation, the national desire to cast of the unbearable yoke began to
awaken. The year 1821 of the Uprising in the Peloponnese lit up the peaks of mount Olympus
and mount Athos. Al though the repressive measures taken by the Turkish army and the
seizure of hostages in Thessaloniki did not dishearten the rebels of Em manuel Pappas and
the archimandrite Kallinikos Stamatiadis on Mount Athos and Thasos, who were thirsting for
action, the insurrectionaries' ignorance of military affairs and their lack of sup plies,
together with the ease with which the Turks were able to mobilize large armies, strangled
the movement at its birth. The uprisings on Olympus and Bermion met with a similar fate,
ending in the tragedy of the holocaust of Naousa.
After the liberation of southern Greece and the foundation of the free Greek state -
the fur thering of the Great Idea -spirits were restored and, with the invisible support
of the Greek con sulate in Thessaloniki, incursions began into Turkish-held Macedonian
areas, to stir up arm bands. Tsamis Karatasos roused Chalkidike. So, too, did Captain
Georgakis. The unfavorable turn taken by the Cretan Struggle, however, and the inability
of Greeks and Serbs to make com mon cause once again prevented a general up rising of the
Macedonians.
In the second half of the 19th century, the international conjunctures tended to favor
the other peoples of the Balkan peninsula and inter national diplomacy adopted a hostile
stance to wards Greek affairs. With the nationalist move ments of Bulgaria rivaling the
Turkish rulers in their anti-Greek attitudes, Macedonia, the apple of strife of the south
Balkans, strove to preserve its Greek integrity by building schools and found ing
educational societies; it countered Slav ex pansionism with the historical reality and the
Or thodoxy of the Ecumenical Patriarchate, and mobilized yet again its armed hopes and the
youth of Free Greece. The Macedonian Struggle was in preparation. From the ill-fated year
of 1875, from the inauspicious 1897, despite the genocide and the hecatombs of victims,
the marshes of Yanitsa, the mountain peaks of Gre vena, the forested ravines of Florina
were trans formed into pages on which, at the turn of the 20th century, men like Pavlos
Melas, Constantine Mazarakis-Ainian, Spyromilios, Tellos Agapi nos (Agras) and so many
others, known and anonymous, wrote the name of Macedonian re generation in their blood. In
an empire on its way to collapse, despite the Young Turks' movement for renewal, and in
opposition to a heavily armed, irrevocably hostile Bulgaria, with Serbia as an unreliable
ally, Hellenism countered with the rights of the nation and, on 26th of October 1912,
raised the flag of the cross in the capital of Ma cedonia, Thessaloniki. Behind it, 500
years of slavery that had not succeeded in creating slaves. Half a millennium of torture,
persecution, murder, plotting, disappointment and falsification of history donned once
more the blue and white and, with the sword of justice, opened the road to the modern age.
The age of the Balkan epic and progress.
Copyright © 1995 Ekdotike Athinon S.A.

 |